In the practice of accounting entities, problems are emerging regarding the calculation and accounting of depreciation for fixed assets, initial recognition and subsequent revaluation, determination of fair value, checking for impairment, and the correct and reliable reflection of information about them in financial statements. In this article, we have discussed in detail the current state of fixed assets depreciation accounting and its improvement, and have provided proposals and recommendations for its improvement
The topic of this paper focuses on the comparison of fixed asset accounting under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and National Accounting Standards (NAS). Fixed assets are the most important long-term assets that play a key role in the financial position of an organisation. The study examines the main differences in the approaches to recognition, measurement, depreciation and asset retirement accounting between the two systems. Particular attention is paid to the revaluation of fixed assets, depreciation methods, and approaches to accounting for repair and modernisation costs. The paper analyses how different standards affect financial reporting and management decision making, and what key aspects should be considered when moving from one accounting system to another. The study focuses on analysing the flexibility of IFRS and the limitations of NAS, which is important for accountants, financial professionals and managers working in different legal and economic environments.
This article studies the issues of improving current asset accounting and financial stability analysis in economic entities of the Republic of Uzbekistan based on foreign experience. The main purpose of the study is to scientifically, theoretically and practically substantiate ways to increase the financial stability of enterprises through effective management of receivables, cash flows, finished product inventories and other working capital in the current assets structure. Recommendations have been developed to eliminate existing problems in the conditions of Uzbekistan based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS)
This article scientifically covers the issues of improving the process of revaluation of fixed assets. In particular, a comparative analysis of national and international standards for revaluation of fixed assets is carried out, their similarities and differences are revealed. Also, methods of revaluation of fixed assets are classified and the procedure for their application in practice is described. Scientifically based proposals are developed on the consistent sequence of organization and implementation of the revaluation process, and relevant conclusions are formulated.
This article discusses the issues of improving the audit of intangible assets (IA) using the example of Asakabank JSCB operating in the banking system of Uzbekistan. The study analyzed software, internet banking platforms, mobile applications, brand value and other intellectual property objects recorded in the bank's balance sheet in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 38 "Intangible Assets" and IFRS 3 "Business Combinations". The main problems encountered in the process of auditing IIA at Asakabank - subjectivity in valuation, insufficient completeness of the legal documents base, discrepancies in depreciation policies - were identified, and proposals and recommendations based on advanced international practices were developed to eliminate them. In particular, measures such as standardizing the valuation methodology, integrating digital technologies into the audit process, improving the skills of auditors and strengthening intellectual property rights were proposed. The results of the study will serve to increase the transparency of the audit of intangible assets at Asakabank JSCB and ensure the reliability of financial statements.
The article discusses the issues of accounting for real estate objects. The use of international financial reporting standards in organizing accounting for real estate objects is shown.